Assembly Policy & Regulation Social Media

Assembly’s CEO Valerie Davis on what brands can learn from US political campaigns

Author

By The Drum, Editorial

July 25, 2024 | 5 min read

US political parties are expected to spend a staggering $12bn on media campaigns in the run up to this year's election, signaling not only the high stakes of political power but also the evolving battleground of advertising strategies.

Gordon Young and Valerie Davis

The Drum's Gordon Young and Assembly's Valerie Davis talked politics at The Drum Live event in New York on Wednesday

At the heart of this evolution is the convergence of politics and commercial marketing, a topic explored in the latest episode of Politics for Drummies by Valerie Davis, CEO of Assembly, and The Drum's Gordon Young, as part of The Drum Live event in New York.

Davis, whose firm handles a hefty portfolio of both political and commercial clients, emphasized the unique demands of today's advertising landscape, stating, “Political advertising impacts all media for all clients, not just during election cycles but across all marketing efforts.”

As brands gear up for their own campaigns, understanding the dynamics of political advertising could provide crucial insights. Davis explained how techniques honed in political arenas, such as real-time response strategies and advanced demographic targeting, are invaluable for brands aiming to navigate the increasingly fragmented media environment.

Powered by AI

Explore frequently asked questions

“We’ve built dashboards and technology that allow us to track not just how candidates are performing but how market sentiments are shifting, almost in real-time,” Davis noted, underscoring the importance of agility in message delivery.

One critical takeaway for brands is the impact of political advertising on market saturation. During election cycles, key battleground states like Arizona, Nevada, and Pennsylvania see a deluge of political ads, which can lead to commercial messages being drowned out. Brands must be strategic about when and where to place their ads to avoid being overshadowed or, worse, inadvertently aligning with a political message that could alienate part of their audience.

The discussion also touched on the potential ramifications of a TikTok ban, a topic of significant relevance given the platform's substantial reach among younger demographics.Davis expressed concerns about the platform's future, given its prohibition of political advertising and the ongoing scrutiny over data privacy and misinformation. “TikTok has become a critical platform for reaching millennials and Gen Z, who are less responsive to traditional media. The uncertainty around its operational status could significantly disrupt current marketing strategies,” Davis elaborated.

Moreover, the conversation veered into the ethical landscapes navigated by agencies like Assembly. “Our job isn’t to take a political stance but to ensure our clients can engage effectively with their audience,” Davis said, highlighting the delicate balance of maintaining neutrality in a polarized atmosphere. This aspect of political marketing— navigating public sentiment without compromising ethical standards—is particularly pertinent for brands aiming to engage on social issues without appearing insincere or opportunistic.

As brands consider their future advertising strategies, Davis’ insights from the political arena offer a clear message: the need for rapid adaptation to changing media landscapes, understanding audience sentiment in real-time, and navigating the ethical considerations of engagement are more crucial than ever. In an era where consumer attention is a prized commodity, and digital platforms are continually evolving, the lessons from political advertising are not just useful but necessary for staying ahead in a competitive market.

Assembly Policy & Regulation Social Media

More from Assembly

View all

Trending

Industry insights

View all
Add your own content +